Virtual Law Practice

Tag: deliver legal services online

  • Upcoming Webinar/CLE – How to Operate a Virtual Law Office and Deliver Legal Services Online

    On July 13th and 14th, I will be presenting a two-part webinar with CLE credit for the North Carolina Bar Association on the topic of creating a virtual law office and delivering legal services online. 

    The first part will be a basic introduction to virtual law practice and how it is used by both completely web-based law firms and traditional law offices for law practice management.  We’ll look at case studies along the way.  This first part will also examine the technology used to create a virtual law practice and include a discussion of the ethics risks that are unique to this form of law practice management and ways to mitigate the risks. 

    The second part of the webinar will focus on the practical how-tos of setting up a virtual law office.   If you are interested in joining me, you can register for the webinar on the NCBA site.

  • Recent AZ Bar Ethics Opinion Discusses eLawyering Methods

    The Arizona State Bar has published Ethics Opinion 09-04 “Confidentiality; Maintaining Client Files; Electronic Storage; Internet” in December 2009.  This opinion will apply to attorneys operating virtual law practices within the AZ Bar jurisdiction and is similar to the NC Bar 2008 Formal Ethics Opinion 5, Web-based Management of Client Records published July 2008.  In fact the NC Formal Ethics Opinion 5 is cited in this new AZ opinion.

    AZ Opinion 09-04 addresses the ability of an attorney to work with clients and deliver legal services online.  The question presented in the opinion lays out the method that the inquiring attorney would use to securely deliver the documents to his or her clients online.  In this case, the documents would be converted to “password-protected PDF format,” and the client would access those files for review over a secure site which uses “encryption and three layers of unique randomly generated alpha-numeric folder names and passwords.”

    The AZ Bar pointed to the two related, existing rules of professional conduct which are the same rules that we have seen applied in other opinions related to virtual law practice: Competence and Confidentiality of Information.  A previous AZ Bar ethics opinion has permitted electronic storage of law office data, including clients’ files (Az Ethics Op.05-04). 

    Here is what I love about this opinion.  They allow for the proposed method of delivering legal services online to the client, but they recognize that this is not where it ends. From the Opinion:

    However, the Committee also recognizes that technology advances may make certain protective measures obsolete over time.  Therefore, the Committee does not suggest that the protective measures at issue in Ethics Op. 05-04 or in this opinion necessarily satisfy ER 1.6’s requirements indefinitely.  Instead, whether a particular system provides reasonable protective measures must be “informed by the technology reasonably available at the time to secure data against unintentional disclosure.” N.J. Ethics Op. 701.  As technology advances occur, lawyers should periodically review security measures in place to ensure that they still reasonably protect the security and confidentiality of the clients’ documents and information. (emphasis added)

    This is clearly the best way that the state bars can address virtual law practice without preventing or discouraging innovation.   The attorney practicing law online has the responsibility to stay current on the security issues involved in using the technology. If they are not able to do so for themselves, then they need to trust an IT professional or their SaaS provider to keep their system up to date and protected.

  • Clickwrap Agreements in a Virtual Law Practice

    I’ve been doing more blogging for the VLOTech website. A lot of my material is coming from the CLE manuscript that I’m drafting for a presentation this summer on security/ethics issues with virtual law practices. The legality and enforceability of clickwrap agreements in a vlo is a question I’ve gotten from other attorneys.

    In my virtual practice, I don’t soley rely on the clickwrap agreement that my clients are required to accept before registering for their own homepage. I more specifically define the scope of legal representation (or non-representation as the case may be) with each individual client that registers. That is handled on each client’s secure homepage and depends on the legal work they are seeking. As more attorneys go online with their law practices, the use of the clickwrap agreement will probably be standard on the vlo, but I suspect each individual solo or small firm practitioner will want to use an additional retainer agreement or other contracting method with clients after registration.

    Here’s my post from the VLOTech website on this subject:

    Solo and small firm practitioners operating a VLO require that their online clients accept a clickwrap agreement before registering for a homepage on the virtual law office. This agreement contains the terms and conditions of the attorney’s representation to the client, explains the nature of unbundled legal services, defines the scope of representation and may contain other provisions tailored to the attorney’s virtual law practice.

    While retainer fees, payment arrangements and further definition of the scope of legal representation is communicated with the client through the client’s secure homepage on a case by case basis, the standard clickwrap agreement for the VLO serves as the legal contract between the attorney and his or her online client. Some attorneys may chose to require that their clients download and sign a separate written agreement following registration similar to a traditional retainer agreement. The business method depends on the individual virtual law practice. However, an online agreement during client registration with the terms and conditions for use of the VLO is standard.

    The ABA Committee on Cyberspace Law during a panel discussion at the ABA’s Annual Meeting last year provided a practical reminder of the steps to follow when creating an online agreement. Blogger, Jason Haislmaier, in his blog ThinkingOpen, provides a great blog post regarding the drafting of enforceable online agreements and the Cyberspace Law Committee’s recommendations.

    Haislmaier writes,

    “In particular, the panel indicated that the working group had identified four “bottom line” steps for forming legally binding online agreements:

    1. The user must have adequate notice that the proposed terms exist;

    2. The user must have a meaningful opportunity to review the terms;

    3. The user must have adequate notice that taking a specified, optional action manifests assent to the terms; and

    4. The user must, in fact, take that action.

    Among these four steps, adequate notice of the existence of the proposed terms is among the most important.”

    VLOTech attorneys draft their own terms and conditions for use with their virtual law offices. The ABA Cyberspace Law website has a searchable archive for members which contains many good resources to assist attorneys in researching this topic and drafting their VLO online agreements.

MENU