Presentation on Virtual Law Practice for Ethics Commission 20/20

February 7, 2010

The ABA’s Commission on Ethics 20/20 held a public hearing at the ABA’s Mid-year conference in Orlando, Florida to discuss topics related to their Preliminary Issues Outline.  On Friday, I was honored to be invited to speak to the commission about virtual law practice.   The ABA Now wrote up an article about the hearing and presentations here.  

Below are slides from my presentation at the hearing.  The text of the hearing should be available on the ABA’s website at some point in the near future.  I am happy to report that the Commission is making a great effort to educate itself on the subject of virtual law practice from the benefits to the concerns related to this form of law practice.  I hope to have the opportunity in the future to share additional information on the topic with its members. 


Reminders for Avoiding Malpractice in Virtual Law Practice

January 25, 2010

 

This past Friday I attended a Law Practice Management Section Council meeting at the NCBA Bar Center.  This is the first meeting I’ve attended in person. Usually I am on conference call and booming my thoughts to the group via voice box.   Thanks to the Chair, Lee Rosen, these meetings are about the least boring I’ve ever been in and worth the two hour drive up to Raleigh. 

At each session, we have an educational “mini-CLE” for the council members.  This past Friday’s mini-CLE was presented by Mark Scruggs of NC Lawyers Mutual which provides services to attorneys licensed to practice in North Carolina.   Mark engaged us in a great “refresher” session on the top malpractice issues and how to avoid them.  Many of these tips are ones that every attorney knows by heart, but it can’t hurt to occasionally review the basics. 

For the attorney with a virtual law practice, it might good to review these rules and put them in the perspective of how they apply to the use of technology to deliver legal services online.  Here are some of the reminders for avoiding malpractice that Mark discussed.  He did not talk about virtual law practice, but I’ve added here below how I thought they related to an attorney practicing law online.  These tips were based on those issues for which his company sees the most malpractice claims filed. Read the rest of this entry »


Contributing to the Lawyerist

January 24, 2010

 

I’m happy to announce that I will be a contributor to the Lawyerist.com blog.  Here’s my intro post.  An article on unbundling legal services with a virtual law practice should post sometime next week.  If anyone has requests for topics related to virtual law practice that they would like for me to cover on this blog or as a contributor to Lawyerist, please drop me a line.


Drawing the Line – What a Virtual Law Practice is Not

January 13, 2010

Defining virtual law practice and the delivery of legal services online by licensed professionals is becoming ever more important as the market continues to fill with companies offering various forms of online legal services.  Two of the biggest concerns that surround these companies include the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) and misleading the public.  Many of these entities do not provide attorney review of the legal documents that they sale online and are coming up against strong criticism for this aspect as well some of their marketing techniques.  For example, the Connecticut Bar Association has formed a task force to review the websites that provide unbundled online legal services.  According to the task force, their primary concern is for the consumer’s safety.  Last year the North Carolina State Bar’s Authorized Practice Committee also investigated the services provided by LegalZoom  claiming they constituted UPL by non-licensed professionals.

Let’s be clear: the Internet-based legal services companies facing criticism do not provide the same level of quality or security of a virtual law office. Read the rest of this entry »


Recent AZ Bar Ethics Opinion Discusses eLawyering Methods

January 7, 2010

 

The Arizona State Bar has published Ethics Opinion 09-04 “Confidentiality; Maintaining Client Files; Electronic Storage; Internet” in December 2009.  This opinion will apply to attorneys operating virtual law practices within the AZ Bar jurisdiction and is similar to the NC Bar 2008 Formal Ethics Opinion 5, Web-based Management of Client Records published July 2008.  In fact the NC Formal Ethics Opinion 5 is cited in this new AZ opinion.

AZ Opinion 09-04 addresses the ability of an attorney to work with clients and deliver legal services online.   The question presented in the opinion lays out the method that the inquiring attorney would use to securely deliver the documents to his or her clients online.  In this case, the documents would be converted to “password-protected PDF format,” and the client would access those files for review over a secure site which uses “encryption and three layers of unique randomly generated alpha-numeric folder names and passwords.”

The AZ Bar pointed to the two related, existing rules of professional conduct which are the same rules that we have seen applied in other opinions related to virtual law practice: Competence and Confidentiality of Information.  A previous AZ Bar ethics opinion has permitted electronic storage of law office data, including clients’ files (Az Ethics Op.05-04). 

Here is what I love about this opinion.  They allow for the proposed method of delivering legal services online to the client, but they recognize that this is not where it ends. From the Opinion:

However, the Committee also recognizes that technology advances may make certain protective measures obsolete over time.  Therefore, the Committee does not suggest that the protective measures at issue in Ethics Op. 05-04 or in this opinion necessarily satisfy ER 1.6’s requirements indefinitely.  Instead, whether a particular system provides reasonable protective measures must be “informed by the technology reasonably available at the time to secure data against unintentional disclosure.” N.J. Ethics Op. 701.  As technology advances occur, lawyers should periodically review security measures in place to ensure that they still reasonably protect the security and confidentiality of the clients’ documents and information. (emphasis added)

This is clearly the best way that the state bars can address virtual law practice without preventing or discouraging innovation.   The attorney practicing law online has the responsibility to stay current on the security issues involved in using the technology. If they are not able to do so for themselves, then they need to trust an IT professional or their SaaS provider to keep their system up to date and protected.